1 2   
作者:Henrylmk2 (220.xxx.xxx.192) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-15 00:28
Good evening Pegasus bro , Standardlens bro
ths for yr demon
Now I won't give up this fun and cheap Lens after today's retesting
ha

Regards
Henry
 


作者:standardlens (219.xxx.xxx.47) 發表主題:63 回應文章:516 日期:2006-01-15 00:09
Look like an extra wide lens, good for travel

Standardlens
 


作者:Pegasus (222.xxx.xxx.97) 發表主題:343 回應文章:3083 日期:2006-01-14 23:55
Henry Hing, I also took my Zenitar 16 Fisheye with me today, here are 2 pics taken with D200 today

 

Happy shooting!

作者:Henrylmk2 (220.xxx.xxx.192) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-14 23:47

 


作者:Henrylmk2 (220.xxx.xxx.192) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-14 23:45

 


作者:Henrylmk2 (220.xxx.xxx.192) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-14 23:43
Good evening Birds 1010 bro and Pegasus bro
Here is the 2nd test for my fun Lens today

ths
Regards
Henry

 


作者:josephC (203.xxx.xxx.82) 發表主題:11 回應文章:157 日期:2006-01-13 19:04
Thanks a lot
 


作者:Pegasus (202.xxx.xxx.18) 發表主題:343 回應文章:3083 日期:2006-01-13 14:54
Cheung Gor is the boss at "照相館" in TST. The store has recently moved to Kimberly hotel on Kimerly street.
 

Happy shooting!

作者:josephC (210.xxx.xxx.5) 發表主題:11 回應文章:157 日期:2006-01-13 13:27
Pegasus bro is not a demon (just joking). By the way, where is Cheong Gor (no need to answer if it is not right to advertise here). Thanks.
 


作者:Henrylmk2 (57.xxx.xxx.38) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-13 11:26
Good day Pegasus bro
Ths for yr demon again
As mentioned before, this is only a fun Lens for me lah,
I wu like to try it again seriously again hahah in order to compare with Standardlens bro 's beloved Lens

ths
Regards
Henry
 


作者:Pegasus (202.xxx.xxx.18) 發表主題:343 回應文章:3083 日期:2006-01-13 10:28
Henry hing,

Don't worry lar, this lens is not that bad at all, here is a pic that I roughly took this morning on the bus on my way to work, the sharpness is really not that bad and saturation is ok too. I will do more test during lunch for you.

The only difference between yours and mine is that mine is AI mount, everything else should be the same.

 

Happy shooting!

作者:Henrylmk2 (57.xxx.xxx.38) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-13 09:13
Good moring Standardlens bro
Ths for yr demon !
Pretty agreed with u that how much u pay, what do u want buddy
For me I am just looking for fun , so what do I say costing me HKD 700 from Cheong Gor's shop. Maybe I will try Zenitar again by coming Sat .....

ths
Henry
 


作者:standardlens (219.xxx.xxx.92) 發表主題:63 回應文章:516 日期:2006-01-13 00:33
Dear Henry and Josephc

I think Zenitar is a acceptable lens in view of its price. But if picture quality is a must, I have no choice but pay more for quality .

Standardlens

 


作者:Henrylmk2 (57.xxx.xxx.38) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-12 16:33
Good day joesphC bro
ths for yr feeling and advice
I do see there of course some diff between Nikkor and Zenitar lah,
however, what do u say HKD 4000 vs HKD 700.00 , that I bot from Cheong Gor's shop last early yr, one thing that it is also to fit with my Minolat D5D , I am fond of its colour effect

Last but not least, actaully it is pretty seldom use of this Lens.
Only just for fun , not to worry mate .

ths
Regards
Henry
 


作者:josephC (210.xxx.xxx.5) 發表主題:11 回應文章:157 日期:2006-01-12 16:26
The point I was trying to make is to avoid using Zenitar 16mm above f8. In previous situations of the church shot I used f2.8 and the results are not acceptable. Also, you can see that the Nikon 16mm is much better from these photos (there is at least one shot from the same location).
 


作者:Henrylmk2 (57.xxx.xxx.38) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-12 16:24
Good day Octosch bro
I do reckon that it is still a taste of G-mount Lens , but will be pretty bl**dy expensive .

ths
Regards
Henry
 


作者:octosch (218.xxx.xxx.31) 發表主題:152 回應文章:333 日期:2006-01-12 11:26
impressive henry hing
how about **85mm1.4 ZF carl zeiss in nikon mount??

 


作者:Mark K (203.xxx.xxx.198) 發表主題:125 回應文章:5089 日期:2006-01-12 00:59
 

Mark K

作者:standardlens (219.xxx.xxx.146) 發表主題:63 回應文章:516 日期:2006-01-11 23:31
Dear Henry

I have taken some photos by Nikon 16mm MF previously. Just post them to see the difference . All photos were taken by hand-held with setting of ISO 640 + F.4 + 1/20.

Standardlens

 


作者:birds1010 (219.xxx.xxx.167) 發表主題:272 回應文章:8807 日期:2006-01-11 20:49
Henry Hing

I respect your testing of the Zenitar by a brave combination of exposure. I look forward to seeing you to extend the performance of the lens under a more favourable condition, such as sunny f8.

 


作者:josephC (210.xxx.xxx.5) 發表主題:11 回應文章:157 日期:2006-01-11 15:22
As I expected, you had been using it wide open. When I first use this lens, I tend to use it that way. Then I found that the whole frame is soft. When I first own this lens, I was limited by the speed of film. Now with dslr, I can stretch it. As in this example, I shot at f11 1/30 with a 350d at iso1600 underexposed by 2 stops. It was probably the limit of the camera/lens combination. I did not use a tripod as the people are moving anyway. It met my requirements and gave me a bonus of star-light effect on the candles. I did not use a filter and do not know how this came about.

In another example, you can see how f16 under sufficient light performed. I think this is a good lens for the price but the genuine Nikon or Canon 16mm are sharper at larger apertures.

Enjoy shooting.

 


作者:Henrylmk2 (57.xxx.xxx.38) 發表主題:111 回應文章:831 日期:2006-01-11 11:06
Good day josephC
it was a rush test last nite hahahah ,without any support eg tripod
just keen to see the colour and whether it is fit with my new baby Minolta D5D

You know , I just handheld with ISO 800-1600 , Aperture was at 2.8 with shutter speed 30 , anti-shake is on

Maybe I gonna with my tripod hahahah

ths
Regards
Henry
 


作者:josephC (210.xxx.xxx.5) 發表主題:11 回應文章:157 日期:2006-01-11 10:36
Can't see the aperture you were using from your photo but I think it was larger than 8. My experience with this lens is that you can only use 11 or 16 and occasionally 8. It gets soft at larger apertures. To take a night shot, you can consider pushing exposure compensation 1 or 2 stops down and lighten the picture later in software. Then you make it possible to use 11 or 16 with acceptable shutter speed.
 


作者:Henrylmk (219.xxx.xxx.231) 發表主題:40 回應文章:212 日期:2006-01-10 23:25

 


作者:Henrylmk (219.xxx.xxx.231) 發表主題:40 回應文章:212 日期:2006-01-10 23:24

 


 1 2   
寫留言

對不起,您必須在留言前Login

按這裡