|
|
|
|
|
"120要黎晒相不如買MINOLTA MULTI SCAN PRO / NIKON CS9000.....
一係比人打相/DRUM SCAN" x 2
When compared 135 film scanned by CS5000 with that by 9950F. It is very obvious that the quality of 9950F  is not acceptable for 晒相 but only good for web posting. I believe 4990 will perform more or less the same as 9950F. Anyway if I didn't get the chance to compare I might think the 9950F was good enough. It's just a matter of comparison.
If I knew that I would have 120 films before I bought my CS5000 I would certainly buy a CS9000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120要黎晒相不如買MINOLTA MULTI SCAN PRO / NIKON CS9000.....
一係比人打相/DRUM SCAN
我135用NIKON CS4 , 再對比SCAN120既I900....I900<--  |
|
CD: SONY XB790QS DAC+PRE-AMP:MACKIE ONXY400F
SPEAKER: ROLAND DS5
AV CENTER: ONKYO 805 center speaker: Mirage V2CC
SUB WOOFER: YAMAHA SW305
EX-EQU: YAMAHA MG12/4, P3200 , CP2000 , MIRAGE
MC2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really think so.
For 135 films, you have better to buy a 135 film scanner
For 120 film, either 4990 or 9950 will be a safer alternative.
Why not Microtek? They tend to boost their specifications. It is better to wait for a while while some professional reviews come out.
check them out here
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Menus/reviews_frame.htm |
|
Mark K
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
好多謝你地嘅意見，
我有初步嘅了解。
不過我近排聽到話 Microtek i800 D質素好過 Epson 4990，
大家有何意見？ |
|
捕捉生命中最動人的一刻
http://fotop.net/eleung
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
恕我直言, 如果用黎哂相, 平台式冇部好,
除非你係冇乜要求, 但玩得菲林同120, 我諗有D要求掛. 網上貼圖唔使$2,000買部9950F啦. 用4990掃只係浪費菲林同沖費. 個人意見, 用緊4990既見諒. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPSON 4990~  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
microtek 麻麻...I900用家......  |
|
CD: SONY XB790QS DAC+PRE-AMP:MACKIE ONXY400F
SPEAKER: ROLAND DS5
AV CENTER: ONKYO 805 center speaker: Mirage V2CC
SUB WOOFER: YAMAHA SW305
EX-EQU: YAMAHA MG12/4, P3200 , CP2000 , MIRAGE
MC2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
我想買部平台式 Scanner scan 135同120底片。
心目中有 Epson 4990 同 Canon 9950F，
不過聽人講 Microtek 都幾好。
定係仲有第D好choice?
請問各位大佬邊部最好？
|
|
|
捕捉生命中最動人的一刻
http://fotop.net/eleung
|
|
|
|
對不起，您必須在留言前Login
按這裡 login
|
|
|
|
|
