1  
作者:RomRom (203.xxx.xxx.95) 發表主題:64 回應文章:1873 日期:2004-04-17 10:45
ASR同好會 (203.xxx.xxx.196)
=================================




tforce1 (202.xxx.xxx.220)
I felt Unico was good but not as quick in response. Unico gives you
more clean sound. Anyway, still running in..
====================================================================
I also feel it sound good, but dont think it is too slow as I
heard Mcintosh, MF is good in Hi & Mid, but Low freq. is not
powerful enough, I am now very "FAN"
 

師父教落: 貴有貴玩,平有平玩,自己郁手仲更好玩

作者:tforce1 (202.xxx.xxx.220) 發表主題:7 回應文章:94 日期:2004-04-17 01:16
Hello:

I have tested Unico before aginst NAIM, Creek, and couple
others..Finally bought Unico I (the solid state version) I felt Unico
was good but not as quick in response. Unico gives you more clean
sound. Anyway, still running in..
 


作者:網友九叔 (203.xxx.xxx.196) 發表主題:424 回應文章:8798 日期:2004-04-16 22:56
褒後會否有更好的發揮?
 


作者:RomRom (219.xxx.xxx.101) 發表主題:64 回應文章:1873 日期:2004-04-16 22:56
RE

 

師父教落: 貴有貴玩,平有平玩,自己郁手仲更好玩

 1  
討 論 主 題
作者: RomRom (12.xxx.xxx.22) 發表主題:64 回應文章:1873 日期:2004-04-16 13:51

請問此機的用家此機如何?
因為初聽覺得不錯,但不知褒後會否有更好的發揮??與同價比又如何?

 

師父教落: 貴有貴玩,平有平玩,自己郁手仲更好玩

寫留言

對不起,您必須在留言前Login

按這裡